Compare audit approaches
Evidence-based diffs — not a claim that any firm blocks every attack.
Comparing smart contract audit firms is about matching method, proof, and price to the risk you are taking — not picking a winner from a marketing scoreboard. Teams usually weigh how findings are verified, how deep the review goes, how long delivery takes, and whether the report is usable for investors and users. This hub collects factual diffs so you can see those dimensions side by side before you sign.
A comparison page is not a claim that one firm blocks every attack or that another firm is obsolete. Different shops optimize for different things: brand reputation, formal methods, speed, or public ratings. FinGuard publishes what we can show — sandbox exploit proof on confirmed findings, a seven-layer process, a flat 1599 USDT fee, and SkyEye public scores — and we label what we do not claim.
Start with FinGuard vs CertiK if you want a concrete example. That page contrasts verification style, pricing, and public rating products without asking you to treat either name as a substitute for your own due diligence. If you already know you need a full audit, open pricing for the flat fee and scope. If you only need a first look at a deployed contract, use SkyEye.